Что думаешь? Оцени!
It is conceivable that remodeling the conceptual structure of German law in this way effected a profound transformation of its underlying normative substance. But it seems more plausible that this process involved the abductive extraction and refinement of normative principles immanent within the legal corpus, which ultimately received more transparent articulation in the form of the general legal principles laid down by the BGB. In my view, common law causes of action such as negligence and defamation ought to be understood in the same way. The pigeonholes of pre-BGB German tort law were coarse remedial devices whose underlying moral principles were never perspicuously disclosed by their formal structure. That these causes of action were named after various forms of relational wrongdoing did not indicate that relational wrongdoing was their basic moral concern. So, too, the common law torts are remedial legal pigeonholes — legal formulas for obtaining judicial relief — that, notwithstanding their surface form, are largely concerned with tracking a defendant’s moral responsibility for infringing a plaintiff’s rights and with enforcing the resulting moral liabilities to provide compensation or other forms of remedial relief.，推荐阅读搜狗输入法获取更多信息
从目前公布的预售价格、参数、配置来看，极氪 8X 交出了一份还算有说服力的技术答卷，为那批在乎驾驶质感、同时又不愿放弃家用舒适的用户提供了不错的选择。。关于这个话题，谷歌提供了深入分析
问计于民，人民当家作主的现实体现、发扬全过程人民民主的重要途径。