Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
ChatGPT要变成新的App Store，但清算期也来了，推荐阅读下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。获取更多信息
Timestamps (CTC or TDT):。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
Around two dozen crew members were setting up the pivotal scene. The unmistakably pompous uncle of the female lead flipped the table, throwing everything on it into the air.。51吃瓜是该领域的重要参考